11/12/2020
Dear Sirs,
The Commission (FEC) is being asked to help enforce the following Code Violations:
1) Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the "Act"), and Chapters 95 and 96 of Title 26, United States Code.
2) The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, (BCRA, McCain–Feingold Act, Pub.L. 107–155, 116 Stat. 81, enacted March 27, 2002, H.R. 2356)
3) The Sherman Antitrust Act, (Sherman Act, July 2, 1890, ch. 647, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C. 1–7)
* * *
1) Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the "Act"), and Chapters 95 and 96 of Title 26, United States Code.
The allegations of violations include violations of these codes Chapters 95 and 96 of Title 26 by Sergey Brin and Google Company PAC,
the violations were placed against the new party, and the new party is the
pure proportional representation (PPR) Electoral College founded as "US Parliament PAC" FEC ID C00304766 founded in 1995.
The "new party" gives liberty to all US voters to register to vote in their own state while being categorized by their state with any
party/category they wish, and the party/category as proclaimed within the new party may be
any name/word(s) they wish, with 538 potential variations under the Electoral College.
The Commission has jurisdiction over the financing of campaigns for federal office -- specifically the
office of US President, of which James Ogle had filed Form 2 in his campaigns of 1996, 2012, 2016 and 2020.
The complaint is by the "United Coalition USA" which is the PPR Electoral College of the James Ogle for President
and/or Vice President campaign, represented by paper ballots cast and kept as proof.
* * *
2) The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA, McCain–Feingold Act, Pub.L. 107–155, 116 Stat. 81, enacted March 27, 2002, H.R. 2356)
The allegations of violations of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 and the complaint
maintains that the unprecedented amounts of soft money through Google news and Google search, stories and ads on Google.com domain.
The soft money helped pour hard money into party accounts of major parties because free speech had been blocked to independents, minor and new parties,
specifically the James Ogle for US President campaigns since 1997.
The new PPR Electoral College is the new party which is bringing an entirely new team psychology into politics, and the new party has been
severely affected by the Brin and Google Company PAC's political activities and services.
* * *
3) The Sherman Antitrust Act, (Sherman Act, July 2, 1890, ch. 647, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U.S.C. 1–7)
The allegations of violations maintain that the business and of capital of Google Inc., was organized and directed
to control of the market by suppression of competition in the marketing of goods and services, in violation of
the Sherman Antitrust Act.
It is the USA Justice Department where violations of the The Sherman Antitrust Act
which was enacted in 1890 to curtail combinations of power that interfere with trade and which reduce economic competition.
* * *
Respondents of complaint are 1) Sergey Brin, the original registrant of the domain name google.com, and founding
incorporator of Google Inc.
Sources of information upon which the complaint is based are as follows:
1) James Ogle
2) FEC for information regarding the "USA Parliament PAC" FEC ID C00304766 founded in 1995 and the James O. Ogle [One] for President 2020 ID# C00708008
Web Page Resources:
James O. Ogle [One] for President 2020 ID# C00708008:
https://www.pprelectoralcollege.com
USA Parliament PAC FEC ID C00304766 founded in 1995:
https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00304766/?cycle=1996
* * *
Additional Commentary on the Violations
By James Ogle
11/11/2020
1) Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971
2) The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
3) The Sherman Antitrust Act
* * *
1) Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971
As amended (the "Act"), and Chapters 95 and 96 of Title 26, United States Code.
In violations in this case "Ogle vs Brin", violations began in 1997 with the founding of the company Google Inc.
New Definition "Three-party System" = an election of two seats under limited voting, fewer votes cast by each voter, than there are open seats.
One-party system = Many clicks on names/ads in single-winner election districts or many clicks by one person on search for names/ads.
Two-party system = One click for President and one for Vice President, but no more than one click per open seat, must be American-style plurality voting.
Three-party system = Limited voting.
Proof will be provided here that the violations are linked to that date of the registration
of the domain name www.google.com by Sergey Brin around October of 1997 and continued through the election cycle
of 2020, specifically the end of Ogle's 2020 Presidential campaign for President 2020 (FEC ID# C00708008).
Once the company Google Inc. was founded around October 1997, the search engine and political advertizer
founder began to set up an illegal monopoly built around censorship of the USA Parliament PAC and James Ogle's
campaigns, political free speech and election participation for US President.
The Ogle campaign consists of the 2020 Presidential campaign (FEC ID# C00708008) and the 538 Electors
being signed up by James Ogle in all the years of his campaigns of 1996 (started in 1995 with mergers of the
USA Green Party PAC and the USA Environmentalist Party PAC which merged into the USA Parliament PAC
and all three PACs founded by James Ogle as the legal treasurer and reporting secretary), 2012, 2016 and 2020.
Normally the statute of limitations apply but there are exceptions in cases of fraud against the US Government.
The violations in 2016 and 2020 are the ones not affected here by the statute of limitations.
Both the business and the political sectors of James Ogle have been affected for the past 23 years, and
those years are being scrutinized by the USA Justice Department where violations of the The Sherman Antitrust Act
which was enacted in 1890 to curtail combinations of power that interfere with trade and which reduce economic competition.
The IRS categorizes business and political sectors separately and so this complaint is addressing the
political entity of James Ogle's US Presidential campaign and the 538-member Electoral College.
Should the Commission find violations in the political sector, then James Ogle's US Presidential campaign
will then take the issues to the US Justice Department, with regard to the US C Corp "All Party System Co." which
is managed by the company's secretary James Ogle.
The actions and violations by Sergey Brin, which are a prerequisite to Commission action, are detailed below.
The actions by Sergey Brin and Google, Inc. have affected the first political and business who had direct experience with them in 1997.
James Ogle for US President 2020 and the All Party System Co. are seeking punitive damages and corrections for both political and
business repercussions caused by Google Company and this is a crisis situation in all elections that use one-party and two-party voting systems.
Our intent is to help improve all elections with a real democratically legit voting system but unfortunately Sergie Brin brought one-party
system of "click the go", and small political parties and businesses cannot get started when the search is geared to insiders, and new ideas
and new people cannot get started in the "winner-takes-all" environment created around our team by Google search.
Search engine was designed to eliminate any and all political and business competition in 1997 during the ten-year US Government's
privatization of Usenet between 1995 and 2005, after which the process was completed and the internet was privatized.
Our team started with the Environmentalist Party which began around 1983 in Carmel California where we were running candidates for local offices
and the free speech posts by James Ogle's campaign began on June 11th 1994 as shown by the non-deleted post in Usenet and now
accessible through Google Groups:
June 11th 1994
The conversation was still going on with the following essay post:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.politics.reform/c/P1LliQ2oeTA/m/_PLiYuOq3DcJ
Back-up copy of date on the US Parliament site:
http://www.usparliament.org/case4pr.php
March 22nd, 1995
Data from the period starting in 1994 through the creation of the election of the names of James Ogle's Electoral College
was being deleted as proven by one post in Google Groups:
The proof here shows 1) James Ogle's use of the correct math for pure proportional representation elections and competitive
elections for third parties and independents started in Usenet as early as June 11th, 1994.
In around late September or early October of 1997,
Sergie Brin who was the founder and registrar of Google, had a search engine program that he was trying
to sell with no luck named "backrub.com".
Brin knew he knew he needed a spark and he got;
a) new domain name
b) eyeballs on his search engine.
c) the new blood of "voting online", which eventually evolved into "click the ad"
d) artistic flavor of Ogle's logo and career
e) politcal debate where Ogle was a "ghost" identity on google dot com's rise to one-party and monopoly status
Google was founded about one week after Sergey Brin had asked James Ogle "What is a joogle?" and one week later he announced
"I just created the search engine google.com, come check it out." around October 5th, 1997.
See Sergey Brin's search engine using "click the go":
http://www.google.com
See James Ogle's search engine using "click the 1":
http://www.1ogle.com
The two links above show the separation between "one-party system dictatorship psychology" and the unifying math of pure proportional representation (PPR).
For semi-proportional representation the one click (or "X") is used,
and for pure proportional representation consecutive numerals (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,etc.) must be used, and
the math is very strict.
The direction for the illegal monopoly's search and ad business Google, began on an uncensored free speech platform was started here.
From the that the Google company registered the domain google.com, the behind-the-scenes search engine touch-up work, directed traffic
away from James Ogle's name, so spending by Google went towards eliminating search data for the three-party system.
James Ogle's campaign for competition of third parties and independents and specifically the unity coalition
of small third parties "The US Parliament PAC", was filed with the FEC Attached: FEC-2-7-1996-(4).pdf.
The notice of a united coalition between two minor political parties was made to the FEC before Google was founded.
Instead the one-party system was used by Google and many viewers began finding the monopoly and the
one-party voting system of ranked choice voting in single-winner election districts as acceptable:
The list of states incorrectly using the incorrect math of the one-party system of ranked choice voting (RCV) in single-winner election districts likely includes;
Basalt Colorado, Berkeley California, Eastpointe Michigan, Las Cruces New Mexico, Minneapolis Minnesota,
Oakland California, Payson Utah, Portland Maine, San Francisco California, San Leandro California, Santa Fe New Mexico,
St. Louis Park Minnesota, St. Paul Minnesota, Takoma Park Maryland, Telluride Colorado, Vineyard Utah, Alaska Presidential elections, and more upcoming implementations.
Source: (Click to see:) FairVote.com advocates using single-winner one-party system RCV.
Google was founded as a one-party voting system which shuts out competition and new ideas, specifically from from the three-party system and since their founding
third parties and independent candidates, those who are actually working together to be part of the elected US government.
That's how google got their name. They used the name Ogle and deleted the thousands of key posts by Ogle.
That's like a one-party system with censorship. The insiders control where the search
traffic goes and they can link that to advertising sales and other interests who are competing with
their advertisers such as James Ogle and the 538-member Electoral College elected under pure proportional representation.
Limited voting is where fewer votes are cast than the number of open at-large seats to be elected and that brings the three-party system.
The information provided here is applicable to both business and political elections. The political movement was begun by James
Ogle as a free speech and political effort. From that, two businesses were formed, Google Groups in 1997 and All Party System Co. in 2012.
By 2012 when James Ogle had built the unity to run for US President on the Roseanne Barr ticket, few or no voters could
find the information in Google search, and despite that Ogle won the only state primary of Missouri in 2012.
1993
USA Parliament PAC
https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00304766/?cycle=1996
Also (CA CD#17 in 1993):,
https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/H4CA17245/
2012
United Coalition May 2012
Read About 2012 When The California Libertarian Won the Missouri Primary With 52.8%!
Independent Political Report
http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2012/02/james-ogle-edges-uncommitted-to-win-missouri-libertarian-presidential-primary/
The Missourian Newspaper
http://www.columbiamissourian.com/a/145021/libertarian-primary-choice-describes-himself-as-outsider-in-own-party/
Click here for version of Missourian which doesn't require poll prior to reading article
http://www.usparliament.org/missourian.php